Epic Stream Tv - [The IPTV Guy, Watch TV in HDEpic stream Tv can be played in the follow platforms: ROKU Click here for details==> IOS ( iphone, mac, apple tv etc)STB EMULATORKODISMARTV (m. EPICSTREAM APP ( download here).

Elisha Ann Cuthbert (born November 30, 1982) is a Canadian actress and model. She became known for playing Kim Bauer in the series 24, Darcie Goldberg in the college. Our film critics on blockbusters, independents and everything in between. Phineas and Ferb The Movie: Across the 2nd Dimension is an animated Disney Channel Original. Today's MAM cover is from Man's Epic July 1966 Saunders art. Ralphus wrote: Damsels in distress are an integral part of the mass media culture.

Best Movies of ALL TIME Best Movies of All Time. Everett (6)You like us, you really like us. You also hate us. Anyway, you click on us, which is the surest way a website has of measuring interest in its content. The All- TIME 1. 00 Movies feature—compiled by Richard Schickel and me, and handsomely packaged by Josh Macht, Mark Coatney and all the smart folks at TIME. May 2. 3rd, its opening daym, in time for Father’s Day.

Thousands of readers have written in to cheer or challenge our selections, and thousands more have voted for their own favorites. The response simply underscores Richard’s and my long- held belief that everybody has two jobs: his own and movie critic. The idea was to assemble 1. TIME began, with the March 3, 1. Later, each of us was asked to contribute five items in sidebars called Great Performances (acting), Guilty Pleasures (trash treasures) and Top Scores (soundtracks). Essentially, though, a century of movies from 8.

That shouldn’t be hard: pick a picture for each year, with 1. Not so simple, in fact, for we faced a couple of complications. The first was that two of us were to agree on the selections; and, though my admiration for Schickel is hardly bounded, and he probably doesn’t mind me, no two critics will agree on all, or even most, great films. The other is the onus of the list- making process. It’s a truism that a list like this takes either an hour (go with your initial inspirations) or a month (weigh every film with Solomonic probity). Our effort clocked in at about four months, off and on.

And the clock is still running. Why do the list? I guess Josh and Mark and Jim Kelly, our peerless leader, hoped to sharpen the profile of the website, and indirectly the magazine. Mission accomplished.) Our genial PR mavens saw some benefits in media exposure. Schickel and I, in our first joint TV appearance after 2. TIME film- critic gig, gassed with Charlie Rose last week.) It’s possible that someone involved with the enterprise wanted to make money.

Not I, of course. As a TIME staff member, I write for the website pro bono, or rather pro ego. Or, honestly, for the fun of it.

That’s how this TIME 1. LISTOMANIAI feel one of my grand gender generalizations coming on, and I can’t resist it, so here goes. Guys love to make lists. Watch Aftershock Online Mic.

The assembling and codifying of useless information speaks to our inner math nerd, our rampant nostalgiast. Girls can play Little League baseball now, but the kid in the stands keeping the box score, and tallying individual achievements into season slugging percentages, is very likely to be a boy. Turning our pastimes into numbers is a way not only of quantifying but also of justifying them. They acquire an atomic weight; to rank them is to give them solidity, meaning.

As a kid I would study the major league batting averages in the Sunday paper more assiduously than any school subject, and I kept box scores of the games our neighborhood team played. Sometimes I devised imaginary box scores too. I know what you’re thinking: he must have been a lonely child. Actually, I wasn’t; I had a loving, indulgent family. But around the nation, countless other kids, more talented or preoccupied than I, were doing the same thing, bending the MLB numbers, reconfiguring the figures. Eventually they would form a group, the Society for American Baseball Research, SABR for short.

One of their group, Bill James, coined the term SABRmetrics to describe the grown- up, boy- like study of those numbers. The statistics they produced, and the inferences they made from those stats, would enrich the game and change the way it was played. So there. As with baseball, so with favorite movies, TV shows, comics. One of my youthful heroes was Fred Von Bernewitz, a Maryland boy not much older than I was. He created, mimeographed and published the E.

C. Checklist, a compilation of every story in each of the dozen or so “New Trend” comic books (Vault of Horror, Weird Science, Mad, etc.) that EC published from 1. Bless his innocent obsession. His list was a signal to hundreds of other E. C. fan- addicts that our love was not a waste of time.

I mean, how could it be, if so many other shared it? A half- century later, with the hardcover, much- expanded edition of the Checklist still in print (under the title Tales of Terror! The EC Companion), Von Bernewitz’s labor of adolescent love is easy to celebrate as trash- art pedantry. Back then, though, applying the rudimentary scholarship of list- making to comics was as radical as Brando’s first movie mumble, or the scream of Little Richard on “Long Tall Sally.”I too was a teenage listmaker. I saw a lot of movies and, at year’s end, picked my favorites. I recently dug up my Top Five of 1. The Seventh Seal, Some Like It Hot, North By Northwest, Rio Bravo and Imitation of Life.

Looking at this quintet, I marvel at the maturity of my youthful tastes—or do I curse my lifelong adolescence?—since, 4. I nominated all five for the TIME 1. The point is that listmaking is a first step to an informed enthusiasm. Juggling, sifting, thinking about the best films leads to measured judgments, the plundering of film histories, a nascent critical acuity. That’s how a hobby becomes a craft, sometimes a career.

Just add verbs and thoughts. Can the choices Schickel and I made have the shelf life of the Von Bernewitz checklist? Probably not; this is just one of what must be a hundred 1. Does film criticism have an equivalent to SABRmetrics—cinemetrics?

Not really. You can’t calibrate genius. There are no Win Scores, no Favorite Toy, for movies and their makers. Many readers would say that Schickel and I have no greater claim than anyone else to impose our crotchets on you.

Doesn’t everyone see a lot of movies and, gradually, amass some all- time preferences? Sure. But, pardon me, we’re better. Our claims to expertise: 1. TIME, that has generously underwritten our cinephilia for, respectively, 3. Our employment is our diploma. Still and all, list of favorites like the All- TIME 1. Movies is just that: a banquet, a groaning board of our fondest prejudices.

You’re all invited to devour the food, or throw it at us. ONCE, TWICE, THREE TIMES 1.

There are 1. 01 ways to choose 1. But I participated only in this century selection, so I’ll tell you what I did. First it’s like a game: I’m throwing a party—who should be on the guest list?

My idea was to invite different sorts for a richer mix. Highbrows and no- brows, the solemn and the frivolous, embracing many genres (musical, western) and forms (short films, experimental, documentaries). I want the Marx Brothers to co- exist with a Robert Bresson nano- drama. And Indian family melodramas to rub shoulders with 7. An eight- decade, international melange. Then it’s research. I re- viewed many of the films under consideration.

I looked at the IMDb’s list of the top 2. Watch Alice In Murderland Online Freeform here. I dipped once more into Roger Ebert’s two volumes called The Great Movies, which contain some very thoughtful journalism on the subject.

I also took a long browse through the stacks of that moldy old library of film trivia, my brain. The result was about 1. Richard the First (Schickel) had already compiled a list of 1. Neither of us knew the other’s preferences until we’d finished this initial round. After this double- blind taste test, the serious work began on the All- TIME 1.

Movies. Finally, then, it’s like a marriage—the intimate exchange of opinions and passions, the business of collating, collaborating and compromising. Once, twice, three times 1. Schickel’s list, my list, our list. For movie critics, deciding which films are best is an anecdotal way of debating first principles. It’s theoretical and, toward the end of the process, it’s personal. Schickel and I were the co- captains of a lifeboat, with some of our favorites clinging to the sides, and we had to determine whose stiff fingers to pry off, which noble films to send into the sea of anonymity.